Flaubert’s Emma Bovary analysis is an example of cheap essay writing.
In a perfect world, which the one Flaubert’s Emma Bovary hankers for in the book “Madame Bovary”, romantic affairs are based on the principle that the two participants are madly in love with each other. However in the society which Flaubert depicts in the text, as in the reality, passion and reason are the only causes people enter into an affair. Some of Bovary’s values are based on reason, but eventually many of her actions and resolutions are driven by the passion. The character of Flaubert’s Emma Bovary in novel “Madame Bovary” was utterly revolutionary for the nineteen century. Whilst Flaubert’s Emma Bovary values were shaped by her surroundings, her actions and decisions were often driven by an intense passion often opposite to societies norms. Bovary on her father’s hamlet in the small town, she dreams of romantic relations and extravagance, of run away from the ennui of the country, which described as “a husband wearing a long black velvet cloak, a sugar-loaf and fancy cuffs!” (Flaubert). What Bovary ended up receiving was Charles Bovary, a doctor who, by Emma’s criteria, was “taught nothing, knew nothing, wanted nothing” (Flaubert). She perceives that passion is missing so when she married, she does not reach the happiness she was imagining and is therefore disappointed by her new life. Later, Emma searched for the fulfillment of her yearnings in love affairs, forgot about any reasons. “Before marriage she thought herself in love; but the happiness that should have followed this love not having come, she must, she thought, have been mistaken. And Emma tried to find out what one meant exactly in life by the words felicity, passion, rapture, that had seemed to her so beautiful in books.” (Flaubert). Flaubert’s Emma Bovary blamed her husband and lovers for her disappointed desires, as though they had betrayed her. Emma’s enormous necessity to love and continued dispassion with reality made her incapable to perform rational solutions or even permit her to deal with her problems.
“Love in the Time of Cholera” written by Colombian author Gabriel Garcia Marquez and “Madame Bovary” are showing different approaches to the same issue. This book celebrates, consequently, the vitality achievable in old age, love over desperation, health over disease, life over death. Different ways of understanding, undergoing, and representing love are presented by the novel’s three main heroes—Florentino Ariza, Fermina Daza, and Dr. Juvenal Urbino. For Florentino, love has the qualities of a desire; its fullest expression happen in art (especially in writing), and it stands in conflict to everyday reality, entirely opposition to rational understanding any reasons. Like Flaubert’s Emma Bovary in “Madame Bovary”, Florentino is filled with ideas of love derived from popular literature; he was a comic figure when reality unexpectedly invades into the world of his fascination. Florentino’s destiny suggests neither acceptance to reality nor the continuation of his trust in a wholly delusive kind of love. Another character, Dr. Urbino often appears more grounded in real world than Florentino, he regards marriage as “an absurd invention” (Marquez), and his marriage to Fermina shows a lifelong effort to prevent the absurd and replace it with something that may withstand rational analysis. After Urbino’s death, she recalls his trust in senselessness of ability to love, he said that “the most important thing in a good marriage is not happiness, but stability” (Marquez). When she brought the memories about Urbino with Florentino, she marked that “could not conceive of a husband better than hers had been, and yet when she recalled their life she found more difficulties than pleasures” (Marquez) confessing to Florentino that she does not “really know if it was love or not” (Marquez).
Flaubert, Gustave. (2003). Madame Bovary. Penguin Classics.
Marquez, Gabriel Garcia. (1988). Love in the Time of Cholera. Knopf.